Target Corporation — EEOC pre-hire assessment conciliation

← All AI hiring cases

EEOC Minneapolis Area Office — administrative conciliation Commissioner’s charge; identifier not disclosed in cited announcementSettled

Related screening enforcement / pre-hire assessments; no AI established · National comparison

Historical agency conciliation concerning pre-hire tests. This is not an AI lawsuit or court finding.

Latest verified development

August 24, 2015: EEOC announced $2.8 million conciliation and assessment reforms.

Last checked: 2026-10-16 · Reviewed by George S. Azadian on 2026-10-16

Case timeline
  1. · Agency action

    EEOC announces conciliation.

    Source document

What this entry tracks

This historical agency matter concerns employment assessments, not an AI lawsuit. The EEOC reported findings that Target’s former tests disproportionately excluded applicants by race and sex, and that a psychological assessment was an impermissible pre-offer medical examination.

Verified resolution

On August 24, 2015, the agency announced a $2.8 million conciliation agreement. Target discontinued the challenged assessments and agreed to validation, monitoring and recordkeeping measures.

The source describes an agency investigation resolved without protracted litigation, not a judicial liability ruling. This entry does not establish AI use or Target’s current assessment practices.

Related tracker coverage

Compare Karraker’s assessment ruling and browse the California AI Hiring Lawsuit Tracker.

Allegations are not court findings. Inclusion does not imply Azadian Law Group, PC represents a party.

    Contact Us