Walker v. Fred Meyer, Inc. — Related screening precedent / background-check disclosures

← All AI hiring cases

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit (Oregon origin) 18-35592Decision issued

Related screening precedent / background-check disclosures · National comparison

The court found parts of an employment disclosure extraneous under FCRA and remanded the clarity issue. It rejected a claim that the pre-adverse-action notice had to offer a direct discussion with the employer. This historical case does not establish AI use.

Latest verified development

2020-03-20: The court found parts of an employment disclosure extraneous under FCRA and remanded the clarity issue. It rejected a claim that the pre-adverse-action notice had to offer a direct discussion with the employer. This historical case does not establish AI use.

Last checked: 2026-10-14 · Reviewed by George S. Azadian on 2026-10-14

Case timeline
  1. · Ruling

    The court found parts of an employment disclosure extraneous under FCRA and remanded the clarity issue. It rejected a claim that the pre-adverse-action notice had to offer a direct discussion with the employer. This historical case does not establish AI use.

    Source document

Category and scope

Related screening precedent / background-check disclosures. The court found parts of an employment disclosure extraneous under FCRA and remanded the clarity issue. It rejected a claim that the pre-adverse-action notice had to offer a direct discussion with the employer. This historical case does not establish AI use.

Source coverage

This entry records the linked decision or announcement. Source reviewed October 14, 2026. It does not assert a later procedural outcome, a current claim deadline, or current legal treatment beyond the cited record. Coverage is limited to the linked record; later procedural history is not asserted.

Allegations are not court findings. Inclusion does not imply Azadian Law Group, PC represents a party.

    Contact Us