EEOC v. iTutorGroup, Inc. et al. — automatic age-based rejection

← All AI hiring cases

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York 1:22-cv-02565Settled

Automated application rejection / age discrimination · National comparison

The EEOC alleged that tutor application software automatically rejected older applicants using age thresholds. The agency announced a $365,000 settlement and nonmonetary relief in September 2023. This is a national automated-hiring comparison.

Latest verified development

The EEOC’s September 11, 2023 announcement describes a consent decree, $365,000 for rejected applicants and at least five years of compliance monitoring. This is a settled enforcement case, not a currently pending liability action.

Last checked: 2026-10-14 · Reviewed by George S. Azadian on 2026-10-14

Case timeline
  1. · Settlement

    EEOC announces $365,000 settlement and additional relief addressing alleged age-based automatic rejections.

    Source document

Why it belongs in this tracker

This enforcement action illustrates alleged discrimination through programmed rejection rules. The source establishes automated screening; it does not establish that the system used machine learning.

Outcome

The EEOC announced monetary relief, training, policy changes and compliance monitoring under a consent decree. The allegations and settlement should be distinguished from a contested judgment finding discrimination. No new 2026 merits development is asserted here.

Allegations are not court findings. Inclusion does not imply Azadian Law Group, PC represents a party.

    Contact Us