EEOC v. Dial Corporation — Historical selection precedent / strength tests
Historical selection precedent / strength tests · National comparison
The appeals court upheld findings that a pre-employment strength test discriminated against women and an approximately $3.3 million award to rejected applicants, according to the EEOC’s announcement. This is a physical-testing case, not AI.
2006-11-17: The appeals court upheld findings that a pre-employment strength test discriminated against women and an approximately $3.3 million award to rejected applicants, according to the EEOC’s announcement. This is a physical-testing case, not AI.
Case timeline
- · Ruling
The appeals court upheld findings that a pre-employment strength test discriminated against women and an approximately $3.3 million award to rejected applicants, according to the EEOC’s announcement. This is a physical-testing case, not AI.
Source document
Source documents
Category and scope
Historical selection precedent / strength tests. The appeals court upheld findings that a pre-employment strength test discriminated against women and an approximately $3.3 million award to rejected applicants, according to the EEOC’s announcement. This is a physical-testing case, not AI.
Source coverage
This entry records the linked decision or announcement. Source reviewed October 14, 2026. It does not assert a later procedural outcome, a current claim deadline, or current legal treatment beyond the cited record. Coverage is limited to the linked record; later procedural history is not asserted.
