EEOC v. BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC — criminal background screening

← All AI hiring cases

U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina 7:13-cv-01583Settled

Related screening enforcement / criminal-record criteria; no AI established · National comparison

Historical EEOC settlement over alleged racial disparities in criminal-record screening of logistics workers. No AI use established.

Latest verified development

September 8, 2015: EEOC announced a $1.6 million consent decree and job opportunities.

Last checked: 2026-10-16 · Reviewed by George S. Azadian on 2026-10-16

Case timeline
  1. · Settlement

    EEOC announces consent decree.

    Source document

What this case tracks

The EEOC alleged that BMW’s criminal-record guidelines disproportionately excluded Black logistics workers when a replacement contractor screened incumbent staff who reapplied for their jobs. This is historical background-screening litigation; no AI use is established.

Verified resolution

On September 8, 2015, the EEOC announced a consent decree requiring $1.6 million and job opportunities. The agreement resolved the litigation and two related charges.

A consent decree is a settlement, not a contested finding of liability. This record does not establish BMW’s current screening practices.

Related tracker coverage

Compare the Dollar General screening settlement, or browse the California AI Hiring Lawsuit Tracker.

Allegations are not court findings. Inclusion does not imply Azadian Law Group, PC represents a party.

    Contact Us