Connor v. First Student, Inc. — Related screening precedent / California background checks

← All AI hiring cases

Supreme Court of California S229428Decision issued

Related screening precedent / California background checks · California case

The court held that overlap between ICRAA and CCRAA did not make ICRAA unconstitutionally vague as applied to employer background checks. Compliance with one statute did not eliminate applicable duties under the other. This concerns employee background investigations, not AI.

Latest verified development

2018-08-20: The court held that overlap between ICRAA and CCRAA did not make ICRAA unconstitutionally vague as applied to employer background checks. Compliance with one statute did not eliminate applicable duties under the other. This concerns employee background investigations, not AI.

Last checked: 2026-10-14 · Reviewed by George S. Azadian on 2026-10-14

Case timeline
  1. · Ruling

    The court held that overlap between ICRAA and CCRAA did not make ICRAA unconstitutionally vague as applied to employer background checks. Compliance with one statute did not eliminate applicable duties under the other. This concerns employee background investigations, not AI.

    Source document

Category and scope

Related screening precedent / California background checks. The court held that overlap between ICRAA and CCRAA did not make ICRAA unconstitutionally vague as applied to employer background checks. Compliance with one statute did not eliminate applicable duties under the other. This concerns employee background investigations, not AI.

Source coverage

This entry records the linked decision or announcement. Source reviewed October 14, 2026. It does not assert a later procedural outcome, a current claim deadline, or current legal treatment beyond the cited record. Coverage is limited to the linked record; later procedural history is not asserted.

Allegations are not court findings. Inclusion does not imply Azadian Law Group, PC represents a party.

    Contact Us