Raines v. U.S. Healthworks Medical Group — screening vendor liability

← All AI hiring cases

Supreme Court of California S273630Decision issued

Related screening precedent / FEHA business-entity agent liability · California case

California precedent addresses potential FEHA liability of screening providers acting as employer agents. No AI use established.

Latest verified development

August 21, 2023: Certified question answered; qualifying business-entity agents may face direct FEHA liability.

Last checked: 2026-10-16 · Reviewed by George S. Azadian on 2026-10-16

Case timeline
  1. · Ruling

    Court answers certified question about agent liability.

    Source document

What this case tracks

Applicants challenged a medical screening provider acting for prospective employers. This is a California screening-vendor precedent, not a finding about AI.

Verified ruling

On August 21, 2023, the California Supreme Court held that a business entity acting as an employer’s agent may face direct FEHA liability when it has at least five employees and performs FEHA-regulated activities for the employer.

The court answered a certified legal question; it did not enter a final discrimination judgment. Later proceedings require separate verification.

Related tracker coverage

See Mobley v. Workday for separate automated-screening litigation, and the California AI Hiring Lawsuit Tracker for other records. Applying this precedent to a particular AI vendor requires separate legal analysis.

Allegations are not court findings. Inclusion does not imply Azadian Law Group, PC represents a party.

    Contact Us