Griggs v. Duke Power Co. — Historical selection precedent / aptitude tests

← All AI hiring cases

Supreme Court of the United States 401 U.S. 424; No. 124Decision issued

Historical selection precedent / aptitude tests · National comparison

The court rejected diploma and general aptitude-test barriers that disproportionately excluded Black workers and lacked demonstrated job-relatedness. This foundational selection-testing decision predates AI and should not be presented as an AI lawsuit.

Latest verified development

1971-03-08: The court rejected diploma and general aptitude-test barriers that disproportionately excluded Black workers and lacked demonstrated job-relatedness. This foundational selection-testing decision predates AI and should not be presented as an AI lawsuit.

Last checked: 2026-10-14 · Reviewed by George S. Azadian on 2026-10-14

Case timeline
  1. · Ruling

    The court rejected diploma and general aptitude-test barriers that disproportionately excluded Black workers and lacked demonstrated job-relatedness. This foundational selection-testing decision predates AI and should not be presented as an AI lawsuit.

    Source document

Category and scope

Historical selection precedent / aptitude tests. The court rejected diploma and general aptitude-test barriers that disproportionately excluded Black workers and lacked demonstrated job-relatedness. This foundational selection-testing decision predates AI and should not be presented as an AI lawsuit.

Source coverage

This entry records the linked decision or announcement. Source reviewed October 14, 2026. It does not assert a later procedural outcome, a current claim deadline, or current legal treatment beyond the cited record. Coverage is limited to the linked record; later procedural history is not asserted.

Allegations are not court findings. Inclusion does not imply Azadian Law Group, PC represents a party.

    Contact Us