Dutta v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. — Related screening precedent / pre-adverse-action notice
Related screening precedent / pre-adverse-action notice · California case
The court affirmed judgment for State Farm because the applicant did not establish concrete injury or material risk of harm from the alleged FCRA notice violation. The case concerns background screening and federal standing, not AI or a general exemption from notice duties.
2018-07-13: The court affirmed judgment for State Farm because the applicant did not establish concrete injury or material risk of harm from the alleged FCRA notice violation. The case concerns background screening and federal standing, not AI or a general exemption from notice duties.
Case timeline
- · Ruling
The court affirmed judgment for State Farm because the applicant did not establish concrete injury or material risk of harm from the alleged FCRA notice violation. The case concerns background screening and federal standing, not AI or a general exemption from notice duties.
Source document
Source documents
Category and scope
Related screening precedent / pre-adverse-action notice. The court affirmed judgment for State Farm because the applicant did not establish concrete injury or material risk of harm from the alleged FCRA notice violation. The case concerns background screening and federal standing, not AI or a general exemption from notice duties.
Source coverage
This entry records the linked decision or announcement. Source reviewed October 14, 2026. It does not assert a later procedural outcome, a current claim deadline, or current legal treatment beyond the cited record. Coverage is limited to the linked record; later procedural history is not asserted.
