Luna v. Hansen & Adkins Auto Transport, Inc. — Related screening precedent / authorization forms
Related screening precedent / authorization forms · California case
The court affirmed summary judgment for the employer. Providing a standalone FCRA disclosure alongside other application materials was permissible; written authorization did not need its own standalone document. This is historical background-check litigation, not an AI case.
2020-04-24: The court affirmed summary judgment for the employer. Providing a standalone FCRA disclosure alongside other application materials was permissible; written authorization did not need its own standalone document. This is historical background-check litigation, not an AI case.
Case timeline
- · Ruling
The court affirmed summary judgment for the employer. Providing a standalone FCRA disclosure alongside other application materials was permissible; written authorization did not need its own standalone document. This is historical background-check litigation, not an AI case.
Source document
Source documents
Category and scope
Related screening precedent / authorization forms. The court affirmed summary judgment for the employer. Providing a standalone FCRA disclosure alongside other application materials was permissible; written authorization did not need its own standalone document. This is historical background-check litigation, not an AI case.
Source coverage
This entry records the linked decision or announcement. Source reviewed October 14, 2026. It does not assert a later procedural outcome, a current claim deadline, or current legal treatment beyond the cited record. Coverage is limited to the linked record; later procedural history is not asserted.
